A Little News

Sunday, September 28, 2008

The 545

The political playhouse in Washington, also referred to as the Congress, has provided us with soap opera-like drama this past week. They have a plan - how nice of them to put aside election concerns and try to save the economy.

In honor of their bipartisan cooperation I am going to share an editorial by Charlie Reese, previously a reporter for the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper. If you're as sick of the "blame game" as I am, this is one of Reese's Pieces (sorry, couldn't help myself) that you'll find quite tasty.

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes? You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices: 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason.They have no legal authority.

They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash.T he politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.

When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Marines are in IRAQ , it's because they want them in IRAQ .

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

On 9-11-03 Barney Frank said Freddie & Fannie were not in distress, a claim he continued to make right up to the bitter end.

Duke Cunningham, a Republican and a war hero, sits in jail because he accepted money for favors.

The party makes no difference. The cesspool we've allowed to grow in D.C. continues to flourish, and yet most of us believe that everyone else's representative is doing a lousy job except for my representative.

I don't have the solution and I don't know anyone who does, but transparency and accountability should be part of everything an elected official does.

5 comments:

PCS said...

So you going to vote to send McHugh back to congress or you one of those people who say "it's not my congressman who is the problem"?

PCS said...

Crickets chirping.

Watson said...

Sorry for the delay in response, I'm spending more time away from the computer and enjoying it. Let's just say that I would find it very difficult to ever vote for anyone who supports a liberal agenda unless there were issues that we agreed upon. During my liberal years I voted for John Anderson because Jimeh Cahtah was a moron and I was convinced by the main stream media that Reagan was another Goldwater. Much to my surprise, four years later I'm a registered Republican and I voted for Reagan. I see liberalism as the road to mediocrity, and thus I would vote for McHugh. I'm sure that was the answer you expected, so feel free to fire off your prepared volley.

PCS said...

Nope, no prepared comment. I just thought since you wrote such a logical post that it would bring you to a logical conclusion. But, I'm guessing that logic is reserved for your readers.

Watson said...

And you'll vote for whom? A Republican?

My guess is you're a lot like me. I could vote for a Democrat if he was like Zell Miller, you could vote for a Republican if their views coincided with yours. Though we end up usually voting for the representative of our party of choice, that does not mean that we base our choice strictly on party affiliation.

I like to think that most of us make our judgements based upon the person, not the party, but I know that's not always the case. My maternal Grandfather, George Bailey, could often be heard saying that he'd never vote for a Democrat as long as he lived. Raising 11 children in the early 20th Century, he felt insulted by FDR and government handouts. He once told a social worker to take her government cheese and get the hell out of his house because he could take care of his own family and didn't need any help from the GD government.

Many times the course of our lives determines our politics, especially if we're introduced to it at an early age. Fortunately or unfortunately, logic isn't always the deciding factor when choosing the person you'll vote for.